Dynaudio Confidence C1 Platinum review: plus comparison with the MK II v& Contour 1.4 LE review

The Confidence by Dynaudio began in 2007 and has garnered multiple positive reviews. The new C1 Platinum is the latest edition, and was launched in 2014 to replace the MK II and the Signature edition.





I had previously reviewed the C1 Signature edition here:


The technical specs off their website :



“The Esotar2 with Precision Coating, Neodymium double magnet and absorbing rear chamber provides the perfect platform for the higher frequencies, while the woofer with its MSP cone, light aluminum wire voice coil and Kapton former is also one of Dynaudio’s best. The 1st order cross-over filter consists of select components and follows a special design achieving a sound radiation slightly directed upwards. The C1 has excellent imaging and staging, while sound reflections from the floor will be considerably less than with conventional monitor designs.”


Armed with an enhanced tweeter, how does it sound?


Review equipment:

Marantz PM 11 S3
Oppo BDP 83 Nuforce Edition

Initially, I had my concerns, about this 100w ‘only’ amplifier driving the trio of 4 ohm bookshelf speakers for this review. But I was pleasantly surprised to find that this amp did a wonderful job of bringing out the best in these speakers without a struggle. I did have to turn up the volume a bit more compared to my B&W 804D.

However this amp did double it’s power into 4 ohms and then again into 2ohms and was able to provide a stable 400w per channel of power into 2 ohms.

It is also a testimony that Dynaudio has been listening, and has been making their speakers more easy to drive and compatible with a wider spectrum of amplifiers.

So how does it sound?

Well I did find out that they can be quite fussy with speaker position. Initially we used a 2.5 m equilateral triangle arrangement, with the speakers 2.5m apart and also the same distance from the listening position.


But this created a rather distance and detached sound, with an odd separation of bass and treble.

I then moved the speakers so that they were about 1.8 metres apart. We did not toe them in, and this was how we listened to all three pairs of speakers.

This did wonders for their sound, and now I could appreciate why these speakers have been lauded in sound journals all over the world.

The main impression was that of a certain neutrality. There is a wholeness of their sound, with no particular emphasis of treble, or mids. But there was a solid bass underpinning that, and it was really impressive. You would be hard put to picture them as bookshelf speakers if you did not see them before listening to them. There is a deep soundstage, with a very revealing sonic signature, neutral, and yet forgiving. The imaging is precise, and three dimensional.

In a small room, you will not miss floorstander speakers, and their simple two way driver arrangement actually makes them easier to integrate into a small room.

The C1 Platinum has an inverted arrangement, which places the tweeter closer to the ear level when one is seated, and the speaker is placed on their own Stand 6.

With this, you will find the tweeter slightly below ear level, and if one is into HT, this puts the tweeter of the front speakers much closer to the height level of their centre speaker.

I also had the opportunity to listen to the older MK II and the new Contour 1.4 LE, which is around half the price of the C1 Platinum.

The Contour actually gives you more: it goes deeper, so you get more bass impact, and the treble is a little more exuberant. But everything just seems a little less controlled. However if you like a more exciting sonic tone, the Contour may suit better, and give you more of the edge of your seat kind of tone. If HT is your game, or you have rather warm and smooth amps, this speaker may give you a little more treble shine. However after the initial impression, I found the C1 sound more easy to live with. The bass is more controlled, and the treble more forgiving, with better definition at all frequencies.

The imaging is also superior with the C1, and you won’t have trouble picking out the differences between the speakers.

With the Confidence MK II, the differences are more subtle. I felt that the MK II had a slightly brighter tone, but that was it. The imaging, the depth of the soundstage was very similar. If you get a good deal on the older speaker, and prefer a slightly brighter sound, then go ahead and score on the MK II. Oh, the MKII has a bit more silver, instead of the totally black faceplate on the Platinum. Since the drivers are the same, I didn't really expect any real difference.

My final thoughts?

USD 6750 for a pair of bookshelf speakers, not including the price of the Stands (another USD 600) is a lot of change, but if you have a smaller room and enjoy listening up close and personal, this speaker will give you a detailed, large three dimensional sound which gives you tremendous retrieval of whatever was on that CD, and yet forgive imperfections on the CD, with a rather impressive amount of bass.

I will start saving up….



______________________________________________________________ 


 I have no financial interest or other interests in any of the items / events I write about.

Comments

  1. You nailed it down mostly correctly.I had s1.4 and c1 and agree with your thoughts.But I sold bouth speakers.I read platinum review in Highfidelity.pl and was intrigued by nice review but reviewer mentioned that there no place for small amps ,need powerfull amps in current and also was impressed by several youtube s1.4 LE videos.Even bought synthesis integrated amplifier and was thinking to buy again may be LE version

    ReplyDelete
  2. Believes that C1 is launched in 2003. The major C is launched in 2002

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

KEF LS 50 Meta review and comparison with the LS50

Dynaudio Heritage Special Speaker Review

Haiku fan review II - Mounting a Fan and Using more than one Fan